Skip to main content

Table 3 Comparison of systemic delivery methods

From: Current status of miRNA-targeting therapeutics and preclinical studies against gastroenterological carcinoma

Delivery method

Features

Advantage and disadvantage

Reference

AMOs

Complementary to mature miRNAs

AMOs are widely used to inhibit miRNAs in vitro and in vivo.

 

Modified AMOs

   

-OMe

2′-O-methyl modification

Modified AMOs have more stability and efficiency than AMOs.

[22],

   

[61–63]

-MOE

2′-O-methoxyethyl modification

Especially LNA increases the stability, efficiency and specificity.

 

-LNA

2′,4′-methylene modification

  

Sponges

Competitive inhibitors which are transcripts expressed from plasmid with strong promoters, containing multiple, tandem binding sites to the miRNAs of interest.

Sponges can block a whole family of related miRNAs. Selectable marker or reporter gene in the vector allows to isolate a fraction of cells in which the family of miRNAs is strongly inhibited.

[64–67]

AAV

Adenovirus- associated vectors

AAV are also widely used for systemic delivery. While the toxicity of viral mediated delivery is rarely reported, it remains controversial.

[47],[62],

   

[68]

(PEI/miR complex)

(Intratumoral injection)

PEI/miR complex, plasmid and CC9 are probably useful for delivery. However we cannot assure their utility because few experiments using them for delivery have been performed.

[69]

Plasmid

miRNA-expressing plasmids encapsulated in small multilamellar cationic liposome (DOTAP/cholesterol)

 

[70]

CC9

A specific tumor-homing and -penetrating bifunctional peptide conjugated with oligonucleotides.

 

[47]

  1. AMOs: anti-miRNA oligonucleotides.
  2. LNA: locked nucleic acid.